the signs of MCA falling

The MCA has finally vanished from the Malaysian cabinet this time around. This was due to 'keeping up' to their promise of not taking any ministerial post in the federal govt in the event they fare badly in GE13. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Well, fare badly is just a consoling word, I would rather say; they lost 'uglily'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First, I say, the MCA are a shameful lot by having a porno-artist as a chairman/president. Not that we should mix personal lives with the work of a politician, but more so because he actually lost in the elections prior to this. . . . . . . . . Another sign of the MCA failing is also due to this chairman donning an arrogant outlook, speaking like a clown to the Malaysian Public. . . . . . . . . . . . . That he said ' I was unlucky to be caught (with pants down, as well as with reproductive organ up)' is a hilariously spiteful excuse when someone caught him having extramarital sex on video. . . . . . . . . . . . MCA has never been a group with integrity in my eyes dating a long time back. Still recall, when they bought over a popular Chinese daily (to become heir political media arm, like the UMNO having Utusan and NST), to make it into a company which make annual losses or 2 million and finally elapsed from the Malaysian media scene. . . . . . . . They made a 'thief' take control of the management in this company. The so-called manager was in fact an ex-reporter of this same newspaper company (then still owned by its original founder) who got sacked for embezzling some charity funds entrusted to him on route to help some needy families. . . . . . . . Such was the vision of a political group which stood on the basis of 'representing the chinese'. . . . . . There was a time, when the MCA had a big problem serving the instalments to their heaquarters building loan, they sent some 'representatives' to the newspaper office and collect 'monies' to help ease off some financial burden, I only offered one ringgit, and they said 'the minimum' is five ringgit. . . . . . . They even said, since I work in a MCA-owned company, I was obliged to make contributions. Wow, what a blackmail. Does this also mean, anyone working in the public / government agencies are all obliged to lick the BN government's toes and vote for them too? . . . . .. . Why, in the first place should a big political group be entrenched in great financial troubles, and continue to utilise a 'glamourous' tall building for a headquarters. Can you use simple buildings for your meetings, while you recuperate from your financial woes? Of course, they cannot. The face and glamour of owning a big building premise is so hard to shed off, they rather go begging than to reside in delapidated huts. . . . . . Such was the philosophy of a group envisioned to 'lead others' into a developed country. Such was the 'leadership' we have been hearing about. . . . . . And they dare to say, if there weren't any chinese representation in the cabinet, we 'chinese' would lose out. What lose out? If they were so powerful like they say, why would they even look so weak and useless when they merely lost some seats in the general elections? Can't they see, the opposition have been losing election after election, for the past 50 years, and their spirit to fight has never ever die down before. . . . . . . . Can't the MCA pick themselves up and show some courage, to face maybe, the 14th, or 15th elections? Is it because they the MCA are people who cannot eat dust? Has the illusion of 'being winners for 50 years' deprived them of their 'courage' to even face defeat? . . . . . . Did the MCA ever know, 'losing' is also an option in life? . . . . . .

Comments